At 07:02 PM 10/3/2005 +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: >"Phillip J. Eby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Since the PEP is accepted and has patches for both its implementation > and a > > good part of its documentation, a major change like this would certainly > > need a better rationale. > >Though given the amount of interest said patch has attracted (none at >all)
Actually, I have been reading the patch and meant to comment on it. I was perplexed by the odd stack behavior of the new opcode until I realized that it's try/finally that's weird. :) I was planning to look into whether that could be cleaned up as well, when I got distracted and didn't go back to it. > perhaps noone cares very much and the proposal should be dropped. I care an awful lot, as 'with' is another framework-dissolving tool that makes it possible to do more things in library form, without needing to resort to template methods. It also enables more context-sensitive programming, in that "global" states can be set and restored in a structured fashion. It may take a while to feel the effects, but it's going to be a big improvement to Python, maybe as big as new-style classes, and certainly bigger than decorators. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
