Eric Nieuwland wrote:
> What happens to
>
> with 40*13+2 as X:
> print X
It would fail with a TypeError because the relevant slot in the type object
was NULL - the TypeError checks aren't shown for simplicity's sake.
This behaviour isn't really any different from the existing PEP 343 - the only
difference is that the statement looks for a __with__ slot on the original
EXPR, rather than looking directly for an __enter__ slot.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
