Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 11/17/05, Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Am 17.11.2005 um 22:03 schrieb Guido van Rossum:
>>
>>
>>>On 11/17/05, Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Currently StringIO.StringIO and cStringIO.StringIO behave differently
>>>>when iterating a closed stream:
> [...]
>
> I hope there isn't anyone here who believes this patch would be a bad idea?
BTW, isatty() has a similar problem:
>>> import StringIO, cStringIO
>>> s = StringIO.StringIO()
>>> s.close()
>>> s.isatty()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/StringIO.py", line 93, in isatty
_complain_ifclosed(self.closed)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/StringIO.py", line 40, in
_complain_ifclosed
raise ValueError, "I/O operation on closed file"
ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
>>> s = cStringIO.StringIO()
>>> s.close()
>>> s.isatty()
False
I guess cStringIO.StringIO.isatty() should raise an exception too.
Bye,
Walter Dörwald
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
