Neal Norwitz wrote: > For those watching, Greg's and Martin's version were almost the same. > However, Greg's version left in the memory leak, while Martin fixed it > by letting the result fall through.
Actually, Greg said (correctly) that his version also fixes the leak: he assumed that FunctionDef would *consume* the references being passed (whether it is successful or not). I don't think this is a good convention, though. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
