Jim Jewett wrote: > Or, at the very least, promote a > *standard* way to say "just get me a canonical ordering of some sort"
That would be my preference. Comparison for canonical ordering should be a distinct operation with its own spelling. Then Guido's > Comparisons other than == and != between disparate types will raise an > exception unless explicitly supported by the type can be true without precluding the existence of a canonical ordering. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
