On 1/6/06, Michael Urman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I put together a non-parsing checker last month to help me feel more > secure after http://python.org/sf/1365916. It's awful code, but the > simple things are easy to change or extend. Fixing the false positives > and other misinterpretations is harder.
Perhaps you could use Synopsis to parse the C code? http://synopsis.fresco.org/ I'm hoping to look into this more. IIRC, it generates an AST from the C source which you can iterate over to find problems. It's got Python APIs. I was hoping it could provide the basis for a static analysis tool to help find local memory (ref) leaks among other things. n _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com