Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> many test frameworks support "expected failures" for this purpose.
> how hard would it be to add a
>
> unittest.FailingTestCase
>
> class that runs a TestCase, catches any errors in it, and signals an
> error ("test foo passed unexpectedly") if it runs cleanly ?
I don't know how hard it would be, but I would also consider this
appropriate. Of course, this should work on a case-by-case basis:
if there are multiple test methods in a class, unexpected passes
of each method should be reported.
Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
