Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Scott David Daniels wrote: >> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/466288 > > my main nit is the name: the test isn't broken in itself, and doesn't need > to be fixed; it's just not expected to succeed at this time. > > the usual term for this is "expected failure" (sometimes called XFAIL).
Would "expect_fail", "expect_failure", "expected_fail", or "expected_failure", work for you? If so, could you rank them? I don't get anything from "xfail", and I'm not sure others will either. --Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
