Michael Hoffman wrote:
> I've been using path.py for some time, and I can tell you that it
> would be a lot less useful if it no longer behaved like string-plus.
As Jason pointed out elsewhere, the strict typechecks that exist *in* the
Python core, and the fact that path.py is *outside* that core makes the
workaround of subclassing string necessary.
Since the PEP process has the power to alter the *core*, then we have other
options than "this is a string, only not".
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
