El mié., 21 mar. 2018 a las 16:23, Guido van Rossum (<gu...@python.org>)
escribió:

> Roberto,
>
> That looks like an interesting class. I presume you're intending to
> publish this as a pip package on PyPI.python.org?
>
>
Precisely.

I'm no lawyer, but I believe you can license your code under a new license
> (I recommend BSD) as long as you keep a copy and a mention of the PSF
> license in your distribution as well. (Though perhaps you could structure
> your code differently and inherit from the standard library modules rather
> than copying them?)
>

I am using inheritance as much as I can. But due to some functions being at
the module level, instead of being Executor methods (for the sake of being
pickelizable, I suppose); I am being forced to copy some of them just to
modify a couple of lines.


> In terms of the package namespace, do not put it in the same namespace as
> standard library code! It probably won't work and will cause world-wide
> pain and suffering for the users of your code. Invent your project name and
> use that as a top-level namespace, like everyone else. :-)
>
>
Ok, I don't want to cause world-wide pain (yet).

Thank you!

Best regards,
Roberto

>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to