On 30 March 2018 at 20:05, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 30.03.18 02:16, Steven D'Aprano пише:
>>
>> Is there a down-side to 2b? It sounds like something you might end up
>> doing at a later date regardless of what you do now.
>
>
> This complicate the compiler and the eval loop, especially in the case of
> nested substitutions in formats, like
>
> f'{value:+{width:d}.{prec:d}f}'
This point reminded me that there's still
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0536/ to consider as well (that's
the PEP about migrating f-strings to a fully nested expression grammar
rather than hijacking the existing string tokenisation code).
I *think* that's an orthogonal concern (since it relates to the
initial parsing and AST compilation phase, rather then the code
generation and execution phase), but it's worth keeping in mind.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
