On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Apr 18, 2018, at 11:17, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> At the moment, it isn't aware of 'del’. > > I don’t know if it’s relevant to the current discussion, but don’t forget > about implicit dels: > > def foo(): > x = 1 > try: > 1/0 > except ZeroDivisionError as x: > pass > print(x) > > > This is one of my favorite Python oddities because it always makes me look > like a genius when I diagnose it. :)
Heh, yeah. My intention is to ignore that altogether. The general policy in Python is "if ever it MIGHT be assigned to, it belongs to that scope" (so even "if 0: x = 1" will mark x as local), so sticking to that would mean treating x as local regardless of the try/except. (On an unrelated subject, I'm keeping the "sublocal scope" concept from the original PEP on ice. It might be worth implementing exception name binding with a sublocal name. But that's for a completely separate PEP.) ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com