On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:56 PM, Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would actually be quite convenient, and far less error-prone, to > add a binding construct inside a complicated expression for purposes > of running under a debugger. The alternative is typing the > sub-expression(s) of interest by hand at the debugger prompt, or > adding print()s, both of which are prone to introducing typos, or > changing results radically due to triggering side effects in the code > invoked by the duplicated sub-expression(s). Adding a binding > construct wouldn't change anything about how the code worked (apart > from possibly clobbering a local name).
I thought this was what q was for :-) https://pypi.org/project/q/ -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
