On 26 April 2018 at 04:46, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > On 2018-04-25 20:33, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> >> Perhaps "m_objclass" could point to the module in this case > > > That was exactly my idea also today. Instead of treating m_objclass as the > defining class, we should generalize it to be the "parent" of the function: > either the class or the module.
PEP 487 refers to this as the "owner" of a descriptor (See the "__set_name__" example implementation in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0487/#trait-descriptors ). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
