On 7 May 2018 at 03:25, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 May 2018 at 11:30, Dan Stromberg <drsali...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd very much like a live in a world where Jython and IronPython and >> MicroPython and Cython and Pyjamas can all catch up and implement >> Python 3.7, 3.8, and so forth. >> > > I'm inclined to agree that a Python 3.8 PEP in the spirit of the PEP 3003 > language moratorium could be a very good idea. Between matrix > multiplication, enhanced tuple unpacking, native coroutines, f-strings, and > type hinting for variable assignments, we've had quite a bit of syntactic > churn in the past few releases, and the rest of the ecosystem really hasn't > caught up on it all yet (and that's not just other implementations - it's > training material, online courses, etc, etc). > > If we're going to take such a step, now's also the time to do it, since > 3.8 feature development is only just getting under way, and if we did > decide to repeat the language moratorium, we could co-announce it with the > Python 3.7 release. > > These are all god points. I think it will be a good idea to take a little pause with syntactic additions and other "cognitively loaded" changes. On the other hand, I think it is fine to work on performance improvements (start-up time, import system etc.), internal APIs (like simplifying start-up sequence and maybe even C API), and polishing corner cases/simplifying existing constructs (like scoping in comprehensions that many people find confusing).
IOW, I think the PEP should describe precisely what is OK, and what is not OK during the moratorium. -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
