sometimes back after the event the BDFL1 said that "the new BDFL might be less demanding"
hint to an imminent new one? i won't tell much the core devs (not all) have already shown their preferences fun fact: weirdly enough after BDFL1 took a vac (for life?), google made it's appearance on the mailing list THE NEED FOR CENTRAL AUTHORITY there is an absolute need for a central coordinator. the main threat to open source projects is politics. when you have someone to settle stuffs, fine you move on PROCEDURE OF ACCEPTANCE since BDFL1 is still alive, that saves the community some trouble. he is i presume aware of py-related stuffs and his choosing of a successor is a most viable option PREMISE OF CHOICE the choice should be made in consultation with the core devs as they are recognised members of the community based on their contributions. the core devs should orient the choice, they in themselves have not the power to veto, topple or reverse the decision. in the unlikely case of complete unfavouritism, the BDFL1 can pursue further CORE DEVS AS COMMITTEE the above hints to the core devs as a body in itself, beyond programming VALIDITY OF CHOICE the choice of BDFL1 must be acknowledged by the community. psf members should vote of whether they like the choice or not, fir it is the users who make the language valuable. by psf members, reference is made to the basic type of membership, open to all py programmers who have agreed to the psf rules. in case of non agreement, the process is to be repeated CRITICISM OF THE BDFLs BY FORMER AND LATTER ONES no BFFL shall criticise others. in case of non-acceptance of actions, a PHA shall be submitted PHA a Python Halt Appeal is a document submitted to the current core devs and the current BDFL to halt a specific activity considered "nuisible" to the growth and development of python. in case of majority acceptance of the core devs, it shall be accepted THE NEED FOR ALTERNATIVE NAMING OF DICTATOR OR EMPHASISING THE MEANING the python leader if he has absolute power should not be questioned or should not be made to back out as his appointment is by definition CITING THIS DOCUMENT / LICENSE this mail can be freely used, modified or built upon provided that attribution is made to the author in clear ways with no obfuscation whatsoever Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ Mauritius
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
