+1 on retaining lambda -1 on any name change
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Paul Moore wrote: > On 2/5/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > After so many attempts to come up with an alternative for lambda, > > perhaps we should admit defeat. I've not had the time to follow the > > most recent rounds, but I propose that we keep lambda, so as to stop > > wasting everybody's talent and time on an impossible quest. > > +1 > > The recently suggested keyword change, from lambda to expr (as in > '''expr x, y: x+y''') looks like an improvement to me, but I suspect > opening up the possibility of a keyword change would simply restart > all the discussions... (Nevertheless, I'd be +1 on lambda being > renamed to expr, if it was an option). > > Paul. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/allison%40shasta.stanford.edu > -- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
