On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 00:32, Stephan Reiter <stephan.rei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Cool. Thanks, Nick! > > I did experiments based on this idea > (https://github.com/stephanreiter/cpython/commit/3bca91c26ac81e517b4aa22302be1741b3315622) > and haven't rejected it yet. :-)
After talking to Graham about this, I unfortunately realised that the reason the callback approach is appearing to work for you is because your application is single-threaded, so you can readily map any invocation of the callback to the desired interpreter. Multi-threaded applications won't have that luxury - they need to be able to set the callback target on a per-thread basis. Graham actually described a plausible approach for doing that several years back: https://bugs.python.org/issue10915#msg126387 We have much better subinterpreter testing support now, so if this is any area that you're interested in, one potential place to start would be to get Antoine's patch back to a point where it applies and compiles again. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
