On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 16:40, Glenn Linderman <v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com> wrote: >> On 1/30/2019 8:45 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >>> On Jan 30, 2019, at 3:41 PM, Glenn Linderman <v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com> wrote: >>> Would it be practical to add deprecated methods to regular dict for the >>> OrderedDict reordering methods that raise with an error suggesting "To use >>> this method, convert dict to OrderedDict." (or some better wording). >> That's an interesting idea. Regular dicts aren't well suited to the >> reordering operations (like lists, repeated inserts at the front of the >> sequence wouldn't be performant relative to OrderedDict which uses >> double-linked lists internally). My instinct is to leave regular dicts >> alone so that they can focus on their primary task (being good a fast >> lookups). > My goal was just to give a meaningful error message if someone misses the > implications in What's New, and has code that actually does expect > named_tuple.as_dict to have the ordering operations.
The downside of doing that is that automated code introspection tools don't know that the methods don't really exist, they just see the method names in the type dictionary and offer them up for code completion. So in this case, the extra runtime check isn't worth the cost of breaking static code analysis and other forms of introspection. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
