On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 05:17, Neil Schemenauer <nas-pyt...@arctrix.com> wrote: > My gut reaction is that we shouldn't revert. However, looking at > the changes, it seems 'multiprocessing.shared_memory' could be an > external extension package that lives in PyPI. It doesn't require > changes to other interpreter internals. It doesn't seem to require > internal Python header files.
The desired dependency in this case goes the other way: we'd like this in the standard library so that other standard library components can use it, and it can eventually become part of the "assumed baseline" that the reference Python interpreter offers to projects building on top of it. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
