Le mar. 19 févr. 2019 à 11:57, INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On the other hand, it makes sense to move _PyTuple_ITEMS to (3) or even (2). > PyTuple_ITEMS(t) seems better than &PyTuple_GET_ITEM(t, 0).
Please don't use &PyTuple_GET_ITEM() or _PyTuple_ITEMS(). It prevents to use a more efficient storage for tuple. Something like: https://pythoncapi.readthedocs.io/optimization_ideas.html#specialized-list-for-small-integers PyPy already has the issue right now. Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
