And for what it's worth, most of the really active contributors from
distutils-sig seem to prefer the "Packaging" category at
https://discuss.python.org/
If you'd prefer to use Discourse, I'd suggest posting there first and
also email distutils-sig with a link to the discussion. Otherwise, go
straight to distutils-sig (just don't be too surprised if you don't seem
to get much traction there or if someone restarts the discussion on
Discourse for you).
Cheers,
Steve
On 19Feb2019 1341, Brett Cannon wrote:
Unfortunately you're still posted to the wrong list, Alexander. You want
to mail distutils-...@python.org <mailto:distutils-...@python.org> where
packaging discussions occur.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:19 AM Alexander Revin <lyss...@gmail.com
<mailto:lyss...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have an idea regarding Python binary wheels on non-glibc platforms,
and it seems that initially I've posted it to the wrong list ([1])
Long story short, the proposal is to use platform tuples (like
compiler ones) for wheel names, which will allow much broader platform
support, for example:
package-1.0-cp36-cp36m-amd64_linux_gnu.whl
package-1.0-cp36-cp36m-amd64_linux_musl.whl
So eventually only {platform tag} part will be modified. Glibc/musl
detection is quite trivial and eventually will be based on existing
one in PEP 513 [2].
Let me know what you think.
Best regards,
Alex
[1]
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2019-February/739524.html
[2] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/#id49
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
