Donovan Baarda wrote: >> Here I think you meant that medusa didn't handle computation in separate >> threads instead. > > No, I pretty much meant what I said :-) > > Medusa didn't have any concept of a deferred, hence the idea of using > one to collect the results of a long computation in another thread never > occurred to them... remember the highly refactored OO beauty that is > twisted was not even a twinkle in anyone's eye yet. > > In theory it would be just as easy to add twisted style deferToThread to > Medusa, and IMHO it is a much better approach. Unfortunately at the time > they went the other way and implemented multiple async-loops in separate > threads.
that doesn't mean that everyone using Medusa has done things in the wrong way, of course ;-) </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
