On May 16, 2019, at 03:12, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I came to the UnraisableHookArgs structseq idea because of my bad > experience with extension warnings "hooks". Let me tell you this story > :-) Thanks for that! > def showwarning(message, category, filename, lineno, file=None, line=None): > ... > def formatwarning(message, category, filename, lineno, line=None): … While I’m fine with the API you propose, you could consider keyword-only arguments to help future proof the call signature. I don’t like it as much because it’s not as backward compatibility proof, but it’s an option to perhaps consider. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
