On Jun 10, 2019, at 23:41, Mariatta <maria...@python.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:19 PM Jeffrey Kintscher <websur...@surf2c.net> 
> wrote:
>> A hypothetical example would be two different issues whose descriptions 
>> appear to be for different behaviors, but are actually caused by the same 
>> underlying chunk of problematic code being called in different ways. It 
>> could be something trivial like a corner case not being handled.
> Hmm, I personally would still consider the additional issues as duplicates. 
> So I would make note in each of the duplicate issue saying "this is caused by 
> the same problem as bpo-X", and close them, and attach the PR only to one bpo 
> ticket.
> To decide which one I would keep open, perhaps the oldest one, but maybe it 
> depends. Perhaps whichever that seems to contain most detailed info? 

I agree.  If it seems better to solve everything in one PR, I would generally 
associate the PR with one issue and close the others as duplicates with 
explanations why.

--
  Ned Deily
  n...@python.org -- []
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/LGOT7ID2QQC5FPY77YVX3MH3N3WZUEY2/

Reply via email to