On 2/13/06, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 13 February 2006 10:03, Georg Brandl wrote: > > The above docs are from August 2005 while docs.python.org/dev is current. > > Shouldn't the old docs be removed? > > I'm afraid I've generally been too busy to chime in much on this topic, but > I've spent a bit of time thinking about it, and would like to keep on top of > the issue still.
Fred, While you are here, are you planning to do the doc releases for 2.5? You are tentatively listed in PEP 356. (Technically it says TBD with a ? next to your name.) > The automatically-maintained version of the development docs is certainly > preferrable to the manually-maintained-by-me version, and I've updated the > link from www.python.org/doc/ to refer to that version for now. However, I > do have some concerns about how this is all structured still. I think this was the quick hack I did. I hope there are many concerns. :-) For example, if the doc build fails, ... Hmmm, this probably isn't a problem. The doc won't be updated, but will still be the last good version. So if I send mail when the doc doesn't build, then it might not be so bad. Will have to test this. I still need to switch over the failure mails to go to python-checkins. There are too many right now though. Unless people don't mind getting several messages about refleaks every day? Anyone? > What I would also like to see is to have an automatically-updated version for > each of the maintainer versions of Python, as well as the development trunk. > That would mean two versions at this point (2.4.x, 2.5.x); only one of those > is currently handled automatically. That shouldn't be a problem. See http://docs.python.org/dev/2.4/ n _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
