On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:21 PM Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2020, at 13:07, Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Just to clarify, this means that 3.9 will ship with the PEG parser as > default, > >> right? If so, this would be a new feature, post beta. Since that is > counter to our > >> general policy, we would need to get explicit RM approval for such a > change. > > > > The idea is merging it *before beta* and make it the default *from the > beta* (maybe > > merging that commit making it the default the day before the beta for > instance). > > Yes, sorry I don’t mean to be pedantic, but it would be better policy-wise > if the new parser were the default in time for the first beta rather than > after. > That was the intention, i.e. releasing beta 1 with the new parser being the default. The current wording in the PEP are wrong, we'll fix that. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/N4QU7AYS7WCSAIQJY7YB3AQBBPLYHEVO/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
