On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 18:29 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Maybe a weird idea, but why not use static methods on the > bytes and str type objects for this ?! > > E.g. bytes.openfile(...) and unicode.openfile(...) (in 3.0 > renamed to str.openfile())
That's also not a bad idea, but I'd leave off one or the other of the redudant "open" and "file" parts. E.g. bytes.open() and unicode.open() seem fine to me (we all know what 'open' means, right? :). -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
