On 26/06/20 2:18 pm, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
Regardless i don't see how an anti-pep would work much better, but I also don't see anything stopping anyone from trying one.  I worry that it'll fragment conversation even more and separate discussions so that everyone is even more confused about overall opinion tallies?  one way to find out...

Maybe there should be a section in each PEP for counter-arguments
that is maintained by another appointed person, independent of the
PEP author and its sponsor. The position could be called "Devil's
Advocate".

--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/PEUKMXKJGG3YCY2WOCFVIUB3IJPAUHH2/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to