On 26/06/20 2:18 pm, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
Regardless i don't see how an anti-pep would work much better, but I also don't see anything stopping anyone from trying one. I worry that it'll fragment conversation even more and separate discussions so that everyone is even more confused about overall opinion tallies? one way to find out...
Maybe there should be a section in each PEP for counter-arguments that is maintained by another appointed person, independent of the PEP author and its sponsor. The position could be called "Devil's Advocate". -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/PEUKMXKJGG3YCY2WOCFVIUB3IJPAUHH2/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/