This one is new but I think unrelated and unmentioned:

Why is the mapping match semantics non-strict about keys? Besides the
"asymmetry" with sequence matches, I think a strict match should be useful
sometimes (quickly deconstructing JSON data comes to my mind, where I want
to know that I didn't get unexpected keys). I cannot get that behaviour
with the current pep. But if we make key strictness the default, I can
always add **_ to my mapping pattern and make it non strict (that's
currently forbidden but the restriction can be lifted). Is there an
assumption (or even better, data evidence) that non-strict checks are much
much more common?

A similar but weaker argument can be made for class patterns (although I
can imagine non-strict matches *are* more common in that case).

Mostly but not completely unrelated to the above, and purely syntactic
sugar bikeshedding, but I think having "..." as an alias for "*_" or "**_"
(depending on context, and I'd say it's *both* inside a class pattern)
could make these patterns slightly more readable.

Best,
D.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:44, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:

> Everyone,
>
> If you've commented and you're worried you haven't been heard, please add
> your issue *concisely* to this new thread. Note that the following issues
> are already open and will be responded to separately; please don't bother
> commenting on these until we've done so:
>
> - Alternative spellings for '|'
> - Whether to add an 'else' clause (and how to indent it)
> - A different token for wildcards instead of '_'
> - What to do about the footgun of 'case foo' vs. 'case .foo'
>
> (Note that the last two could be combined, e.g. '?foo' or 'foo?' to mark a
> variable binding and '?' for a wildcard.)
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)*
> <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/STJSSAETMTUY7FK5AE53IM73Z2WORNYN/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/DS26FCVJ2FCQBRK6OQEBIKYBZPXIIY5P/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to