Hello, On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:16:09 +0000 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 11:25, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> > wrote: > > > > Thank you for the well-written PEP, although I don't agree with it. > > My response below is quite long. Here is my opinionated TL;DR: > > For what it's worth, I find your rebuttal of PEP 642 convincing, and > in line with my thoughts on the matter. > > -1 from me on PEP 642. Given that this was a direct reply to Steven's mail, and he explicitly said: > (4) Using sigils to over-ride the default is okay. That includes > turning what would otherwise be a capture pattern into a comparison. And that's also the stated goal of PEP 642, quoting: > This PEP takes the view that not requiring a marker prefix on value > lookups in match patterns results in a cure that is worse than the > disease: Python's first ever syntax-sensitive value lookup where you > can't transparently replace an attribute lookup with a local variable > lookup So, both PEP 642 and Steven agree that the problem exists, and explicit marker is a suitable means to address it. Then, deriving "rebuttal" and "-1" to PEP 642 from Steven's mail sounds a bit confusing. -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/4GXMELBO6HCXCYWKPQAXOSSC6ZD7Y2ZV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
