This opens the door for people voting on A or B depending on if they would accept or reject the PEP. Is this something we're willing to accept?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:29 PM Ethan Furman via Python-Dev < python-dev@python.org> wrote: > On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to > the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was > > not a unanimous decision). > > This seems very odd. The Steering Council is elected to make decisions, > but it feels like the current SC is passing the > buck. You (the current SC) have spent much time on this, so it seems that > you are in the best position to make a final > decision. If you don't, then the next SC may have to also spend a lot of > time on the issue as well to be comfortable > accepting your recommendation -- time that could be better spent on other > issues. > > If you (the current SC) were actually accepting PEP 634, would the vote be > the same? Then accept it, and let's all move on. > > -- > ~Ethan~ > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/EP7GRKHV7OGRA5S44LIELFMVKILEUS2I/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/7U466T6NQZGQB2DFA7R67JNGKQK2KDIQ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
