On 4/20/21 10:03 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
If you guarded your code with `isinstance(foo, Sequence)` then I could not use it with my `Foo` even if my `Foo` quacked like a sequence. I was forced to use nominal typing; inheriting from Sequence, or explicitly registering as a Sequence.
If I'm reading the library correctly, this is correct--but, perhaps, it could be remedied by adding a __subclasshook__ to Sequence that looked for an __iter__ attribute. That technique might also apply to other ABCs in collections.abc, Mapping for example. Would that work, or am I missing an critical detail?
Cheers, //arry/
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/QRS7JWBP3KX3TYSYDVKILSYOXTLOFUY3/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
