I agree with Tim. Subject, of course, to the same caveat Tim mentions: does the creator want this?
I haven't used the library much, but it's obviously top quality, and adding pure-Python code is less burden than C implementations. On Wed, Nov 10, 2021, 10:19 PM Tim Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > [Bob Fang <[email protected]>] > > This is a modest proposal to consider having sorted containers > > (http://www.grantjenks.com/docs/sortedcontainers/) in standard library. > > +1 from me, but if and only if Grant Jenks (its author) wants that too. > > It's first-rate code in all respects, including that it's a fine > example _of_ Python programming (it's not written in C - in Python). > > People often say "well, put a thing on PyPI first, and see whether > people really want it!". > > SortedContainers has been on PyPI for years straight now, and still > gets hundreds of thousands of downloads from there every day: > > https://pypistats.org/packages/sortedcontainers > > So it's already widely adopted in the community. What else would it > need to prove? > > If it still doesn't qualify, "well, put a thing on PyPI first" is just > obstructionism ;-) > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SE6YOVJQI6OEWNM5SAQL3X5VPEFGVZAA/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5NOGVTADSSSWPEWNHAMR35QYJJA7JDXH/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
