It seems like you have thoroughly read through the PEP and the discussion thread and have formed an opinion about the proposed changes. It's great that you have taken the time to understand the proposal and the reasoning behind it.
Georg Brandl's comments and Greg Ewing's explanations do shed light on some of the concerns raised by the proposal. However, it is good to see that you find the sequence and dict flattening syntax proposals to be clean and logical. Regarding the comprehensions part of the proposal, it appears that you are ambivalent about it. You acknowledge that it provides a way to flatten a sequence of sequences, but you also point out some of the odd edge cases that you discovered while experimenting in the interpreter. It's good to see that you are taking a cautious approach and are not rushing to endorse this part of the proposal. Overall, your analysis is thoughtful and well-reasoned. It's good to see that you are engaging with the proposal in a critical manner and taking into account the different perspectives presented in the discussion thread. Regards: https://www.extraappliance.ca/washing-machine-repair-edmonton/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/6BP32AXSJAJPWHU274M3RBLLFUBSQUC6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
