On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 15:37 -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > > Actually, this prompts me to write about an issue I have with PEP 352. > > I actually don't think it's necessary (yes, I know it's already in the > > tree). > > > > Much to personal pain and sprint time. Are you trying to make me shed > a manly tear, Barry?!? =)
> So it isn't that PEP 352 is unnecessary since there is nothing here > about deprecating string execptions and making built-in exceptions > new-style. You just want to change the renaming of the exceptions. Yes, sorry Brett! No the other things about PEP 352 are all good, and I was only commenting about the new hierarchy changes. I still don't like that part of the PEP, but I appreciate the competing compromises being made so I can live with it for Python 2.x. > I still like my idea of a ControlFlowException, but that died with PEP > 348 (along with part of my innocence). Good! The sooner you replace that with soul-crushing defeatism the happier you will be! > Just remember that PEP 348 was meant for Py3K when we are supposed to > break stuff and how much resistence I hit. Granted my changes were > more radical, but even in the end, small changes were resisted > heavily. In other words, make sure you have the time and energy to > take this on. =) I know all about soul-crushing PEP championship, which is why I'm such a happy person. :) -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
