* Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:20:53 +1200]: > Gareth McCaughan wrote: > > > but wouldn't if be nice if you could say > > > > def f((x0,y0) as p0, (x1,y1) as p1): > > I'm not sure that it would. Currently you can look at > a function header and get a picture of its calling > signature, but this would clutter it up with > implementation details of the function that aren't > relevant to the caller.
For maximal utility, this would affect the calling signature of the function, too: it would now have keyword arguments named p0 and p1. -- mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
