Neal Norwitz wrote:
> On 3/22/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> For the Snake-Farm we had a separate mailing list, so I'd prefer
>>> that if possible. This lets you opt-in to the messages and also
>>> makes it easier to search via the python.org search facility.
>> I'll wait for other people to voice an opinion. Creating a new
>> mailing list is an effort I'd like to avoid.
>
> Hopefully we will get it tuned better soon so there aren't so many
> mails. Unfortunately, it may take a while due to the ssize_t issues
> getting fixed as we find them.
>
> I'd be happy if the messages were on python-checkins.
+1 on simply changing the messages to python-checkins instead of here - it
gives the build failure better context than it gets on python-dev, and
subscribing to python-checkins is a fair indication of willingness to receive
frequent automated mail ;)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
