On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:00 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:53, Neal Norwitz wrote: > > In order to do the best possible job and avoid silly errors, there > > shouldn't be any checkins which could change behaviour that do not > > include a test. I'm not talking about updating comments or string > > constants. But even trivial changes can cause regressions or > > incompatible changes. Just like failing tests, code checked in > > without tests is fair game for being reverted if there is anything > > questionable. > > +1 from me. > > Anyone disagree?
Not me! -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
