Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:47 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: > >>My only concern about this is that it wouldn't be possible for other >>authors to provide 3rd party packages as (for instance) db.mysqldb >>because of the way package importing works. And I'd prefer >>'database.sqlite' rather than 'db.sqlite'. > > +1 on 'database' as the top-level package name.
I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in the standard library. +1 on db.sqlite from me. db.sql.sqlite is another possibility, if adding something like Durus or ZODB in the same top-level namespace could be considered for 2.6. -- Gerhard _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
