M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Anthony Baxter wrote: >> On Friday 31 March 2006 02:04, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>>> Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', >>>> instead. >>> Anything, but please no "db" or "database" top-level module or >>> package :-) >> >> >> How about "sql"? <wink> >> >> I can't think of a better name right now - can anyone else, or should >> it just go in the top level as 'sqlite'? > > I think sqlite is just fine.
sqlite is problematic since the old PySQLite 1.0 (2.x wrapper) had this name. But I'm in favour of a flat name too -- let's use "sqlite3". Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
