On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 13:09 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote:

> Please leave this one alone.  I still need to work on this part of the API 
> and 
> do not currently have the spare clock cycles to do it right now.  You don't 
> HAVE 
> to jam something in right away.  Please let it continue to cook and not muck 
> it 
> up through over-enthusiasm.  If I had time to explain/debate every darned 
> aspect 
> of what is under consideration, then it would have been done already. The 
> fierce 
> insistence for the patch is pre-mature and is grotesquely out-of-proportion 
> to 
> any potential benefit.  Please do not jam this one down my throat -- the 
> function is not necessary to have right away -- you're talking about 
> nanoseconds 
> of efficiency and a microscopically shorter call.  Sorry, I need to stop 
> wasting 
> time on this thread.  It has consumed far too much development time already. 
> Please write a one-line macro for yourself and leave this alone so I can 
> continue the development efforts at a thoughtful pace.

As per your comment in patch 1458476, I will add _PySet_Update() and
consider this thread closed.

-Barry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to