Fredrik Lundh wrote: >> If you would rather contribute by collecting a list of possible >> trackers along with who will maintain it, then please do. I am not >> going to dive into that quite yet, but if you want to parallelize the >> work needed then I would appreciate the help. > > that is what I expected the PSF infrastructure committee to do (I hope > you're not the only one in that committee?); it's a bit disappointing to > hear that we're still stuck on the SF export issue. > > (wasn't there someone with backchannel access to the SF data ?)
Yes. We found a way to export all data (except for file attachments), through a different exporter. This gives all data, unfortunately, it is ill-formed XML (& is not properly entity-referenced sometimes). Anybody who wants to work with these data, please let me know; I made a snapshot a few days ago. The "backchannel access to SF data" was actually someone different: he experimented with the existing export, confirmed the problem, promised to talk to Paul Moore about that, and referred us to the other XML exporter as a work-around (that one allows to export 500 items at a time). Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com