Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Thomas Heller wrote: >> Personally, I *like* the ctypes name. But I'm open for suggestions, >> and it might have intersting consequences if the Python core package >> would be renamed to something else. >> >> Any suggestions? > > Well, my only concern was py_object. I wondered whether the py_ > prefix is really necessary, or, if it is meant to match PyObject* > whether it should be called PyObject or PyObject_p. > > However, if every ctypes user knows what py_object is, there is > probably little point in renaming it.
I have learned that it is too late to rename things in ctypes. If it were still possible, there would be a lot lot more to clean up, but it has grown over the last three years or so. Thomas _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
