"Gustavo Carneiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   Now the problem.  Suppose you have the source package python-foo-bar,
> which installs $pythondir/foo/__init__.py and $pythondir/foo/bar.py.  This
> would make a module called "foo.bar" available.  Likewise, you can have the
> source package python-foo-zbr, which installs $pythondir/foo/__init__.py and
> $pythondir/foo/zbr.py.  This would make a module called "foo.zbr" available.
>
>   The two packages above install the file $pythondir/foo/__init__.py.  If
> one of them adds some content to __init__.py, the other one will overwrite
> it.  Packaging these two packages for e.g. debian would be extremely
> difficult, because no two .deb packages are allowed to intall the same file.
>
>   One solution is to generate the __init__.py file with post-install hooks
> and shell scripts.  Another solution would be for example to have only
> python-foo-bar install the __init__.py file, but then python-foo-zbr would
> have to depend on python-foo-bar, while they're not really related.

Yet another solution would be to put foo/__init__.py into a third
package, e.g. python-foo, on which both python-foo-bar and
python-foo-zbr depend.


   Bernhard

-- 
Intevation GmbH                                 http://intevation.de/
Skencil                                           http://skencil.org/
Thuban                                  http://thuban.intevation.org/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to