On 5/4/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My inclination was to have a PlatformPath subclass that accepted 'os', 'sep'
> and 'extsep' keyword arguments to the constructor, and provided the
> appropriate 'sep' and 'extsep' attributes (supplying 'os' would just be a
> shortcut to avoid specifying the separators explicitly).
>
> That way the main class can avoid being complicated by the relatively rare
> need to operate on another platform's paths, while still supporting the
> ability.
You ought to have predefined classes for the standard OSes. Expecting
people to know the values for sep and extsep seems unhelpful.
In fact, unless you expect to support the os.path interface forever,
as well as the new interface, I'd assume there would have to be
internal WindowsPath and PosixPath classes anyway - much like the
current ntpath and posixpath modules. So keeping that structure, and
simply having
if os.name == 'posix':
Path = PosixPath
elif os.name == 'nt':
Path = WindowsPath
... etc
at the end, would seem simplest.
(But all the current proposals seem to build on os.path, so maybe I
should assume otherwise, that os.path will remain indefinitely...)
Paul.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
