"Michele Simionato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > No, that check would match generator objects, not generators tout court.
tout court?? is not English or commonly used at least in America > On a related notes, inspect.isfunction gives True on a generator, such > as > > def g(): yield None Ok, you mean generator function, which produces generators, not generators themselves. So what you want is a new isgenfunc function. That makes more sense, in a sense, since I can see that you would want to wrap genfuncs differently from regular funcs. But then I wonder why you don't use a different decorator since you know when you are writing a generator function. tjr _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
