Folks,
I've just run a code coverage report for the python2.4 branch:
http://vallista.idyll.org/~t/temp/python2.4-svn/
This report uses my figleaf code,
http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf-latest.tar.gz
Very nice, Titus!
I'm interested in feedback on a few things --
* what more would you want to see in this report?
* is there anything obviously wrong about the report?
In other words... comments solicited ;).
Making the comments in the code stand out less (i.e., not black) might be handy since my eye still gets drawn to the comments a lot.
It would also be nice to be able to sort on different things, such as filename.
But it does seem accurate; random checking of some modules that got high but not perfect covereage all seem to be instances where dependency injection would be required to get the tests to work since they were based on platform-specific things.
By the by, I'm also planning to integrate this into buildbot on some
projects. I'll post the scripts when I get there, and I'd be happy
to help Python itself set it up, of course.
I don't know if we need it hooked into the buildbots (unless it is dirt cheap to generate the report). But hooking it up to the script in Misc/build.sh that Neal has running to report reference leaks and fundamental test failures would be wonderful.
-Brett
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
