On 7/7/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, that's fine with me since I use open() for opening all of my files anyway. But I don't know if people want to make 'file' the only built-in type who lacks a constructor on the type itself.
-Brett
Another thing I perhaps should point out is that
I'm proposing the separation of open() and file()
for *all* code, not just restricted code. So it's
not a matter of "crippling" file() specially for
restricted code.
Well, that's fine with me since I use open() for opening all of my files anyway. But I don't know if people want to make 'file' the only built-in type who lacks a constructor on the type itself.
-Brett
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
