On 7/14/06, Nick Maclaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > OK, then I propose that we wait to see which things you end up having > > to provide to sandboxed code, rather than trying to analyze it to > > death in abstracto. > > However, the ORIGINAL proposal in this thread (to split off argv[0] > and/or make that and the arguments read-only) is entirely different. > That is purely a matter of convenience, cleanliness of specification > or whatever you call it. I can't imagine any good reason to separate > argv[0] from argv[1:] by a sandbox (either way).
Sure. But that proposal has already been discussed (and found little opposition). The thread then dispersed in a much less focused discussion about the true purpose of the sys module.. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
